Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01525
Original file (BC 2014 01525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01525

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Narrative Reason for Separation be corrected to reflect 
Convenience of Government or Reduction in Force, instead of 
Completion of Required Active Service.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was authorized for separation under the force shaping program 
for Fiscal Year 2004.  He was told that he would have full 
veteran benefit entitlements under this program.  However, 
because his narrative reason for separation is not correct, he 
is being denied certain benefits from the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (DVA).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
3 Sep 02.

On 15 May 04, the applicant was honorably discharged and issued 
a narrative reason for separation of, Completion of Required 
Active Service and was credited with 1 year, 8 months, and 
13 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice in the processing of the applicant’s 
discharge.  In addition, the applicant has not submitted a 
timely application.  The applicant submitted a request for 
separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative 
Separation of Airmen, Miscellaneous Reasons, which was approved 
by his commander.  Individual programs fell under the overall 
umbrella of the Force Shaping Program.  Separate programs call 
for separate criteria.  Individuals, like the applicant, who 
applied to separate prior to fulfilling their Active Duty 
Service Commitment (ADSC) would have been required to 
voluntarily apply under Miscellaneous/General Reasons 
provisions.  On the other hand, personnel who chose not to 
separate under one of the voluntary programs, but remained in 
the Air Force, met a force Shaping Board.  If they were selected 
for involuntary separation as a result of the Board, they were 
given the Reduction in Force narrative reason for separation on 
the DD Form 214.  The applicant’s SPD code and narrative reason 
for separation are correct as reflected on his DD Form 214 and 
were issued as a result of his voluntary request to separate 
from active duty.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely not filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01525 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 18 Apr 14.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01762

    Original file (BC 2014 01762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She separated from the Air Force under the Fiscal Year 2007, Air Force - Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service (LADSC) Waiver Program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Consequently, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03367

    Original file (BC 2014 03367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03367 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to change or remove the statement “Member has not completed first full term of service. The applicant's net active service was only 9 months and 22 days at the time of her discharge and she was approved for early release from her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01026

    Original file (BC 2014 01026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01026 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Force Shaping”. His records be corrected to reflect his Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) active duty service commitment (ADSC) was waived due to Force Shaping. On 28 April 2006, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00870

    Original file (BC 2014 00870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to reflect “Reduction in Force” at the convenience of the government. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04532

    Original file (BC 2013 04532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was informed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Education Office that her separation code needs to be changed to reflect “COG” so the DVA can consider her eligibility for the MGIB. She was advised that the DVA will only consider her application if her separation code is changed to “COG.” She voluntarily separated under the FY04 Force Shaping Program; was offered the MGIB prior to separating and wants to use the benefit she paid into. However, according to the DVA letter dated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01261

    Original file (BC 2014 01261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his discharge on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected from “voluntary, miscellaneous reasons” to “Reduction in Force (RIF)” to allow him to receive a certificate of eligibility for a home loan from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281

    Original file (BC 2014 01281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LGH” (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01296

    Original file (BC 2014 01296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Palace Chase.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The narrative reason for separation is incorrect as she went through the Palace Chase program under the 2014 Limited Active Duty Service Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program. We took notice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01372

    Original file (BC 2014 01372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to include a statement that he is a “Vietnam Era Veteran.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He enlisted in the United States Air Force in Feb 75 under the delayed enlistment program and would like his separation documents to recognize him as a “Vietnam Era...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05135

    Original file (BC 2012 05135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05135 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 23 Jan 02 to 2 Jul 01 or in the alternative his TAFMSD be changed back to the original TAFMSD of 30 Sep 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...